LNOAUGXC: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{TAGDEF|LNOAUGXC|.TRUE. {{!}} .FALSE. |.FALSE.}} | {{TAGDEF|LNOAUGXC|.TRUE. {{!}} .FALSE. |.FALSE.}} | ||
Description: {{TAG| | Description: {{TAG|LNOAUGXC}} specifies if the meta-GGA exchange-correlation functionals are evaluated with a density that is augmented or not. | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
== Related tags and articles == | == Related tags and articles == | ||
{{TAG|METAGGA}} | {{TAG|METAGGA}} | ||
{{sc| | {{sc|LNOAUGXC|Examples|Examples that use this tag}} | ||
== References == | == References == |
Revision as of 15:18, 10 June 2024
LNOAUGXC = .TRUE. | .FALSE.
Default: LNOAUGXC = .FALSE.
Description: LNOAUGXC specifies if the meta-GGA exchange-correlation functionals are evaluated with a density that is augmented or not.
The KS kinetic-energy density should in principle be larger than the von Weizsäcker kinetic-energy density . However, for numerical reasons this may not always be the case and can potentially lead to problems depending on the meta-GGA. If LTBOUNDLIBXC=.TRUE. in INCAR, then is applied before is used in a meta-GGA functional from Libxc.
However, according to tests, for some of the most common meta-GGA functionals like SCAN[1], a violation of the lower bound is technically not a problem and, furthermore, applying leads to very inaccurate forces and stress tensor. Therefore, by default LTBOUNDLIBXC=.FALSE. and Libxc should be compiled with the option --disable-fhc
has explained here.
Related tags and articles
References