STM of graphene: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Sur_sci}} | {{Sur_sci - Tutorial}} | ||
== Task == | == Task == |
Revision as of 13:36, 7 June 2019
Overview > Ni 100 surface relaxation > Ni 100 surface DOS > Ni 100 surface bandstructure > Ni 111 surface relaxation > CO on Ni 111 surface > Ni 111 surface high precision > partial DOS of CO on Ni 111 surface > vibrational frequencies of CO on Ni 111 surface > STM of graphite > STM of graphene > collective jumps of a Pt adatom on fcc-Pt (001): Nudged Elastic Band Calculation > List of tutorials
Task
Generation of an STM image of a graphene surface.
Input
POSCAR
C: Graphite Lattice 1.0 +2.4410462393 +0.0000000000 +0.0000000000 -1.2205231197 +2.1140080551 +0.0000000000 +0.0000000000 +0.0000000000 +10.0000000000 2 Cartesian +0.0000000000 +0.0000000000 +0.0000000000 +0.0000000000 +1.4093387034 +0.0000000000
INCAR
general: SYSTEM = Graphite surface slap ENMAX = 400 ISMEAR = 2 ; SIGMA = 0.2 ALGO = Fast partial charge densities: LPARD = .TRUE. LSEPK = .FALSE. LSEPB = .FALSE. NBMOD = -3 EINT = -0.1 0.1 #DOS: #ISTART = 0 #ICHARG = 2 #LORBIT = 11
KPOINTS
K-Points 0 Monkhorst-Pack 9 9 1 0 0 0
Calculation
- This example is carried out in complete analogy to the example STM of graphite.
- The sample output for the graphite (left) and graphene (right) STM images should look like the following:
Download
Overview > Ni 100 surface relaxation > Ni 100 surface DOS > Ni 100 surface bandstructure > Ni 111 surface relaxation > CO on Ni 111 surface > Ni 111 surface high precision > partial DOS of CO on Ni 111 surface > vibrational frequencies of CO on Ni 111 surface > STM of graphite > STM of graphene > collective jumps of a Pt adatom on fcc-Pt (001): Nudged Elastic Band Calculation > List of tutorials
Back to the main page.