Category:DFT+U: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
where <math>\hat{n}</math> is the on-site occupancy matrix of the <math>d</math> or <math>f</math> electrons. This approach is known as the DFT+U method (traditionally called LSDA+U{{cite|anisimov:prb:91|}} ). | where <math>\hat{n}</math> is the on-site occupancy matrix of the <math>d</math> or <math>f</math> electrons. This approach is known as the DFT+U method (traditionally called LSDA+U{{cite|anisimov:prb:91|}} ). | ||
The first VASP DFT+U calculations, including some additional technical details on the VASP implementation, can be found in Ref. {{cite|rohrbach:jcp:03}} (the original implementation was done by Olivier Bengone | The first VASP DFT+U calculations, including some additional technical details on the VASP implementation, can be found in Ref. {{cite|rohrbach:jcp:03}} (the original implementation was done by Olivier Bengone {{cite|Bengone:prb:00}} and Georg Kresse). | ||
==How to== | ==How to== |
Revision as of 19:34, 6 April 2022
Theoretical background
The semilocal LDA and GGA functionals often fail to describe systems with localized (strongly correlated) or -electrons (this manifests itself primarily in the form of unrealistic one-electron energies and too small magnetic moments). In some cases this can be remedied by introducing on the or atom a strong intra-atomic interaction in a simplified (screened) Hartree-Fock like manner (), as an on-site replacement of the semilocal functional (double-counting term ):
where is the on-site occupancy matrix of the or electrons. This approach is known as the DFT+U method (traditionally called LSDA+U[1] ).
The first VASP DFT+U calculations, including some additional technical details on the VASP implementation, can be found in Ref. [2] (the original implementation was done by Olivier Bengone [3] and Georg Kresse).
How to
DFT+U can be used by specifying the tags LDAU and LDAUTYPE in the INCAR file.