ESF SPLINES: Difference between revisions

From VASP Wiki
No edit summary
m (Kaltakm moved page Construction:ESF SPLINES to ESF SPLINES)
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DISPLAYTITLE:ESF_SPLINES}}
{{TAGDEF|ESF_SPLINES|.FALSE. {{!}} .TRUE. |.FALSE.}}
{{TAGDEF|ESF_SPLINES|.FALSE. {{!}} .TRUE. |.FALSE.}}


Description: {{TAG|ESF_SPLINES}} selects k-point interpolation in ACFDT(R) calculations using tri-cubic splines.
Description: Enable k-point interpolation of the electronic structure factor using tricubic splines in [[ACFDT/RPA calculations]].
----
----
Interpolates the electronic structure factor in [[ACFDT/RPA calculations]] using tri-cubic splines to accelerate k-point convergence of the [[RPA/ACFDT:_Correlation_energy_in_the_Random_Phase_Approximation|RPA correlation energy]]. This feature follows the same idea as in coupled cluster calculations.{{cite|liao:jcp:2016}}  
With {{TAG|ESF_SPLINES}} =T, the electronic structure factor (ESF) is interpolated using tricubic splines to accelerate k-point convergence of the [[RPA/ACFDT:_Correlation_energy_in_the_Random_Phase_Approximation|RPA-correlation energy]] in [[ACFDT/RPA calculations]]. The default settings of the maximum number of iteration steps ({{TAG|ESF_NINTER}}) and convergence threshold ({{TAG|ESF_CONV}}) typically yield similar k-point convergence compared to the k-p perturbation theory approach.
 
{{NB|tip|By means of ESF interpolation, one can obtain the RPA-correlation energy for metals and insulators, in contrast to the k-p method that fails for metals.}}
To this end, the electronic structure factor in the RPA
==Algorithm==
This feature follows the same idea as in coupled cluster calculations.{{cite|liao:jcp:2016}}
To compute the RPA-correlation energy, the electronic structure factor in the RPA


<math>
<math>
S({\bf q}+{\bf G}) =\left[ \int {\rm d}\omega \ln( {\bf 1}+{\bf V}\cdot\chi(i\omega))-{\bf V}\cdot\chi(i\omega) \right]_{{\bf G},{\bf G}}({\bf q})
S({\bf q}+{\bf G}) =\int {\rm d}\omega  
\left\{(\mathrm{ln}[1-\tilde\chi^0({\mathbf{q}},\mathrm{i}\omega)V({\mathbf{q}})])_{{\mathbf{G,G}}}  +V_{{\mathbf{G,G}}}({\mathbf{q}})\tilde\chi^0({\mathbf{q}},{\mathrm{i}}\omega) \right\}
</math>
</math>


is evaluated on the k-point grid defined in {{FILE|KPOINTS}} and the correlation energy (as its trace) is stored.{{cite|gelbenegger:thesis2018}}  
is evaluated on the k-point grid defined in {{FILE|KPOINTS}} and the correlation energy (as its trace) is stored.{{cite|gelbenegger:thesis2018}}  
To obtain the correlation energy on a finer k-point grid, more q-points are added using tri-cubic spline interpolation and the resulting energy is compared to the previous correlation energy.  
To obtain the correlation energy on a finer k-point grid, more q-points are added using tricubic spline interpolation. The resulting energy is compared to the previous correlation energy.  
This procedure is repeated {{TAG|ESF_NITER}} times until the difference in energy between the interpolation steps is less than {{TAG|ESF_CONV}}.  
This procedure is repeated {{TAG|ESF_NINTER}} times or until the difference in energy between the interpolation steps is less than {{TAG|ESF_CONV}}.  
The default settings of {{TAG|ESF_NITER}} and {{TAG|ESF_CONV}} typically yield similar k-point convergence compared to the k-p perturbation theory approach, where the limit
 
<math>
==ESF-interpolation method vs k-p perturbation theory==
\lim_{\bf q\to 0} \chi_{{\bf G G}'}({\bf q},i\omega) \cdot {\bf V}_{\bf G G'}({\bf q})
{{NB|warning|Remove {{FILE|WAVEDER}} and avoid setting {{TAG|LOPTICS}}{{=}}T when running a job with {{TAG|ESF_SPLINES}}{{=}}T.}}
</math>
Note that the ESF-interpolation method is incompatible with k-p perturbation theory, where the largest q-point integration error
is stored to {{FILE|WAVECAR}} in a preceding DFT calculation using {{TAG|LOPTICS}}=T.  
:<math>
{{NB|tip|This method works for metals and insulators.}}
\lim_{\bf q\to 0} \tilde\chi^0_{{\bf G G}'}({\bf q},{\rm i}\omega) \cdot {\bf V}_{\bf G G'}({\bf q})
{{NB|warning|Remove {{FILE|WAVEDER}} before running the job and avoid setting {{TAG|LOPTICS}}.}}
</math>  
is added explicitly to the RPA integral. The long-wave limit is ill-defined for metallic systems; hence, the k-p method fails for metals. For the k-p method, the long-wave contribution is stored in the {{FILE|WAVEDER}} file, and VASP assumes you want to add this term if the file is present in the working directory.
 
==Output==
 
The result of the ESF interpolation is reported to the {{FILE|OUTCAR}} file in the following format
 
      cutoff energy    smooth cutoff  RPA  correlation  Hartree contr. to MP2  RPA spline-interp.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            166.667          133.333      -12.9738715106      -19.7255874374      -13.4968000908
            158.730          126.984      -12.8840657072      -19.6294580403      -13.4017404001
            151.172          120.937      -12.7775593388      -19.5151822998      -13.3005326847
            143.973          115.178      -12.6604147404      -19.3892142669      -13.1868498210
            137.117          109.694      -12.5530911576      -19.2733151174      -13.0861120393
            130.588          104.470      -12.4659186304      -19.1786165194      -12.9778587892
            124.369            99.495      -12.3690601643      -19.0725742983      -12.8709666989
            118.447            94.758      -12.2461267475      -18.9372318755      -12.7590723870
  linear regression   
  converged value                          -14.0340307585      -20.8751715586      -14.5828037654


The last column contains the result from the spline interpolation for the selected energy cutoffs reported in the first column.
{{NB|mind|Available as of VASP.6.5.0}}
== Related tags and articles ==
== Related tags and articles ==
{{TAG|ESF_CONV}},  
{{TAG|ESF_CONV}},  
{{TAG|ESF_NITER}},
{{TAG|ESF_NINTER}},
{{TAG|LOPTICS}}
{{TAG|LOPTICS}}


{{sc|ESF_SPLINES|Examples|Examples that use this tag}}
{{sc|ESF_SPLINES|Examples|Examples that use this tag}}
----


[[Category:INCAR tag]][[Category:Many-body perturbation theory]][[Category:GW]][[Category:ACFDT]][[Category:Low-scaling GW and RPA]]
==References==
 
<!--[[Category:INCAR tag]][[Category:Many-body perturbation theory]][[Category:GW]][[Category:ACFDT]][[Category:Low-scaling GW and RPA]]

Latest revision as of 14:09, 18 December 2024

ESF_SPLINES = .FALSE. | .TRUE.
Default: ESF_SPLINES = .FALSE. 

Description: Enable k-point interpolation of the electronic structure factor using tricubic splines in ACFDT/RPA calculations.


With ESF_SPLINES =T, the electronic structure factor (ESF) is interpolated using tricubic splines to accelerate k-point convergence of the RPA-correlation energy in ACFDT/RPA calculations. The default settings of the maximum number of iteration steps (ESF_NINTER) and convergence threshold (ESF_CONV) typically yield similar k-point convergence compared to the k-p perturbation theory approach.

Tip: By means of ESF interpolation, one can obtain the RPA-correlation energy for metals and insulators, in contrast to the k-p method that fails for metals.

Algorithm

This feature follows the same idea as in coupled cluster calculations.[1] To compute the RPA-correlation energy, the electronic structure factor in the RPA

is evaluated on the k-point grid defined in KPOINTS and the correlation energy (as its trace) is stored.[2] To obtain the correlation energy on a finer k-point grid, more q-points are added using tricubic spline interpolation. The resulting energy is compared to the previous correlation energy. This procedure is repeated ESF_NINTER times or until the difference in energy between the interpolation steps is less than ESF_CONV.

ESF-interpolation method vs k-p perturbation theory

Warning: Remove WAVEDER and avoid setting LOPTICS=T when running a job with ESF_SPLINES=T.

Note that the ESF-interpolation method is incompatible with k-p perturbation theory, where the largest q-point integration error

is added explicitly to the RPA integral. The long-wave limit is ill-defined for metallic systems; hence, the k-p method fails for metals. For the k-p method, the long-wave contribution is stored in the WAVEDER file, and VASP assumes you want to add this term if the file is present in the working directory.

Output

The result of the ESF interpolation is reported to the OUTCAR file in the following format

     cutoff energy     smooth cutoff   RPA   correlation   Hartree contr. to MP2  RPA spline-interp.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
           166.667           133.333      -12.9738715106      -19.7255874374      -13.4968000908
           158.730           126.984      -12.8840657072      -19.6294580403      -13.4017404001
           151.172           120.937      -12.7775593388      -19.5151822998      -13.3005326847
           143.973           115.178      -12.6604147404      -19.3892142669      -13.1868498210
           137.117           109.694      -12.5530911576      -19.2733151174      -13.0861120393
           130.588           104.470      -12.4659186304      -19.1786165194      -12.9778587892
           124.369            99.495      -12.3690601643      -19.0725742983      -12.8709666989
           118.447            94.758      -12.2461267475      -18.9372318755      -12.7590723870
 linear regression    
 converged value                          -14.0340307585      -20.8751715586      -14.5828037654

The last column contains the result from the spline interpolation for the selected energy cutoffs reported in the first column.

Mind: Available as of VASP.6.5.0

Related tags and articles

ESF_CONV, ESF_NINTER, LOPTICS

Examples that use this tag

References