Slow-growth approach: Difference between revisions

From VASP Wiki
(Undo revision 7021 by Karsai (talk))
(9 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
can be computed as:
can be computed as:


<math>
::<math>
w^{irrev}_{1 \rightarrow 2}=\int_{{\xi(1)}}^{{\xi(2)}}  \left ( \frac{\partial                                      {V(q)}} {\partial \xi} \right ) \cdot \dot{\xi}\, dt.
w^{irrev}_{1 \rightarrow 2}=\int_{{\xi(1)}}^{{\xi(2)}}  \left ( \frac{\partial                                      {V(q)}} {\partial \xi} \right ) \cdot \dot{\xi}\, dt.
</math>
</math>
Line 14: Line 14:
In the limit of infinitesimally small <math>\dot{\xi}</math>, the work <math>w^{irrev}_{1 \rightarrow 2}</math>
In the limit of infinitesimally small <math>\dot{\xi}</math>, the work <math>w^{irrev}_{1 \rightarrow 2}</math>
corresponds to the free-energy difference between the the final and initial state.
corresponds to the free-energy difference between the the final and initial state.
In the general case, <math>w^{irrev}_{1 \rightarrow 2}$ </math>is the irreversible work related
In the general case, <math>w^{irrev}_{1 \rightarrow 2}</math> is the irreversible work related
to the free energy via Jarzynski's identity<ref name="jarzynski1997"/>:
to the free energy via Jarzynski's identity<ref name="jarzynski1997"/>:


<math>
::<math>
{\rm exp}\left\{-\frac{\Delta A_{1 \rightarrow 2}}{k_B\,T} \right \}=
exp^{-\frac{\Delta A_{1 \rightarrow 2}}{k_B\,T}}=
\bigg \langle {\rm exp} \left \{-\frac{w^{irrev}_{1 \rightarrow 2}}{k_B\,T} \right \} \bigg\rangle.  
\bigg \langle exp^{-\frac{w^{irrev}_{1 \rightarrow 2}}{k_B\,T}} \bigg\rangle.  
</math>
</math>


Line 29: Line 29:
can be found in reference <ref name="oberhofer2005"/>.
can be found in reference <ref name="oberhofer2005"/>.


* For a constrained molecular dynamics run with Andersen thermostat, one has to:
== Anderson thermostat ==
 
* For a slow-growth simulation, one has to perform a calcualtion very similar to {{TAG|Constrained molecular dynamics}} but additionally the transformation velocity-related {{TAG|INCREM}}-tag for each geometric parameter with <tt>STATUS=0</tt> has to be specified. For a slow-growth approach run with Andersen thermostat, one has to:
#Set the standard MD-related tags: {{TAG|IBRION}}=0, {{TAG|TEBEG}}, {{TAG|POTIM}}, and {{TAG|NSW}}
#Set the standard MD-related tags: {{TAG|IBRION}}=0, {{TAG|TEBEG}}, {{TAG|POTIM}}, and {{TAG|NSW}}
#Set {{TAG|MDALGO}}=1, and choose an appropriate setting for {{TAG|ANDERSEN_PROB}}
#Set {{TAG|MDALGO}}=1, and choose an appropriate setting for {{TAG|ANDERSEN_PROB}}
#Define geometric constraints in the {{FILE|ICONST}}-file, and set the {{TAG|STATUS}} parameter for the constrained coordinates to 0
#Define geometric constraints in the {{FILE|ICONST}} file, and set the '''STATUS''' parameter for the constrained coordinates to 0
#When the free-energy gradient is to be computed, set {{TAG|LBLUEOUT}}=.TRUE.
#When the free-energy gradient is to be computed, set {{TAG|LBLUEOUT}}=.TRUE.


<ol start="5">
<ol start="5">
<li>For a slow-growth simulation, one has to perform a calcualtion very similar to {{TAG|Constrained molecular dynamics}} but additionally the transformation velocity-related {{TAG|INCREM}}-tag for each geometric parameter with <tt>STATUS=0</tt> has to be specified.</li>
<li>Specify the transformation velocity-related {{TAG|INCREM}}-tag for each geometric parameter with <tt>STATUS=0</tt>.</li>
</ol>
 
== Nose-Hoover thermostat ==
* For a slow-growth approach run with Nose-Hoover thermostat, one has to:
#Set the standard MD-related tags: {{TAG|IBRION}}=0, {{TAG|TEBEG}}, {{TAG|POTIM}}, and {{TAG|NSW}}
#Set {{TAG|MDALGO}}=2, and choose an appropriate setting for {{TAG|SMASS}}
#Define geometric constraints in the {{FILE|ICONST}}-file, and set the <tt>STATUS</tt> parameter for the constrained coordinates to 0
#When the free-energy gradient is to be computed, set {{TAG|LBLUEOUT}}=.TRUE.
<ol start="5">
<li>Specify the transformation velocity-related {{TAG|INCREM}}-tag for each geometric parameter with <tt>STATUS=0</tt></li>
</ol>
</ol>


VASP can handle multiple (even redundant) constraints. Note, however, that a too large number of constraints can cause problems with the stability of the [[#SHAKE|SHAKE algorithm]]. In problematic cases, it is recommended to use a looser convergence criterion (see {{TAG|SHAKETOL}}) and to allow a larger number of iterations (see {{TAG|SHAKEMAXITER}}) in the [[#SHAKE|SHAKE algorithm]]. Hard constraints may also be used in [[#Metadynamics|metadynamics simulations]] (see {{TAG|MDALGO}}=11 {{!}} 21). Information about the constraints is written onto the {{FILE|REPORT}}-file: check the lines following the string: <tt>Const_coord</tt>
VASP can handle multiple (even redundant) constraints. Note, however, that a too large number of constraints can cause problems with the stability of the [[#SHAKE|SHAKE algorithm]]. In problematic cases, it is recommended to use a looser convergence criterion (see {{TAG|SHAKETOL}}) and to allow a larger number of iterations (see {{TAG|SHAKEMAXITER}}) in the [[#SHAKE|SHAKE algorithm]]. Hard constraints may also be used in [[#Metadynamics|metadynamics simulations]] (see {{TAG|MDALGO}}=11 {{!}} 21). Information about the constraints is written onto the {{FILE|REPORT}}-file: check the lines following the string: <tt>Const_coord</tt>


== References ==
== References ==
Line 49: Line 61:
</references>
</references>
----
----
[[The_VASP_Manual|Contents]]


[[Category:Molecular Dynamics]][[Category:Slow-growth approach]][[Category:Theory]][[Category:Howto]]
[[Category:Molecular dynamics]][[Category:Slow-growth approach]][[Category:Theory]][[Category:Howto]]

Revision as of 06:12, 14 June 2024

The free-energy profile along a geometric parameter can be scanned by an approximate slow-growth approach[1]. In this method, the value of is linearly changed from the value characteristic for the initial state (1) to that for the final state (2) with a velocity of transformation . The resulting work needed to perform a transformation can be computed as:

In the limit of infinitesimally small , the work corresponds to the free-energy difference between the the final and initial state. In the general case, is the irreversible work related to the free energy via Jarzynski's identity[2]:

Note that calculation of the free-energy via this equation requires averaging of the term over many realizations of the transformation. Detailed description of the simulation protocol that employs Jarzynski's identity can be found in reference [3].

Anderson thermostat

  • For a slow-growth simulation, one has to perform a calcualtion very similar to Constrained molecular dynamics but additionally the transformation velocity-related INCREM-tag for each geometric parameter with STATUS=0 has to be specified. For a slow-growth approach run with Andersen thermostat, one has to:
  1. Set the standard MD-related tags: IBRION=0, TEBEG, POTIM, and NSW
  2. Set MDALGO=1, and choose an appropriate setting for ANDERSEN_PROB
  3. Define geometric constraints in the ICONST file, and set the STATUS parameter for the constrained coordinates to 0
  4. When the free-energy gradient is to be computed, set LBLUEOUT=.TRUE.
  1. Specify the transformation velocity-related INCREM-tag for each geometric parameter with STATUS=0.

Nose-Hoover thermostat

  • For a slow-growth approach run with Nose-Hoover thermostat, one has to:
  1. Set the standard MD-related tags: IBRION=0, TEBEG, POTIM, and NSW
  2. Set MDALGO=2, and choose an appropriate setting for SMASS
  3. Define geometric constraints in the ICONST-file, and set the STATUS parameter for the constrained coordinates to 0
  4. When the free-energy gradient is to be computed, set LBLUEOUT=.TRUE.
  1. Specify the transformation velocity-related INCREM-tag for each geometric parameter with STATUS=0


VASP can handle multiple (even redundant) constraints. Note, however, that a too large number of constraints can cause problems with the stability of the SHAKE algorithm. In problematic cases, it is recommended to use a looser convergence criterion (see SHAKETOL) and to allow a larger number of iterations (see SHAKEMAXITER) in the SHAKE algorithm. Hard constraints may also be used in metadynamics simulations (see MDALGO=11 | 21). Information about the constraints is written onto the REPORT-file: check the lines following the string: Const_coord

References